Process

 

  •       Establish CORE Leadership Team
  •    Gather Information – Building Drawings, District Standards, Mapping, Roofing, Priority Lists
  •      School Safety Advisory Committee Information
  •      Curriculum Study, prepared by EES
  •      Regular CORE Leadership Team Meetings
  •      Demographer update, Matthew Ruther, U of L
  •      School Board “work session” to establish goals, process, timeline
  •      Staff Input Sessions (all buildings) per five (5) categories:
    •  Functionality/Efficiency/Flexibility
    •  Collaboration/Connections
    •  Accessibility/Special Programming
    •  Comfort & Well Being
    •  Safety & Security
  •     On-site Conditional Assessments (all buildings)
    •  All disciplines; architectural, interiors, site, MEP, technology
    •  Score all systems on 0 (poor) to 4 (new) scale.
  •      NAFCS vacant property review
  •      Begin Input of Data into SCOPE (Strategic Capture of Planning Elements)
  •      Programming review (all buildings)
  •      Development of projects and cost estimates for ten (10) years
  •      Prepare final “Master Planning Document”
Staff Input Forms


What is a Suitability Score & How is it Used?

The professional team scores the existing building materials, systems, and site components

Score is based on the evaluation of existing condition & expected lifespan condition of components. Score is categorized into existing capacity, educational effectiveness, safety, security, code compliance, healthy learning environments, and condition of existing technology.


Overall Building Suitability Scores:











Popular posts from this blog

Take the Survey – District Feedback on Facilities

Introduction